<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://absolutemichigan.com/dig/michigan/green-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://absolutemichigan.com/michigan/green-monday/</link>
	<description>All Michigan, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enviro Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://absolutemichigan.com/michigan/green-monday/#comment-39171</link>
		<dc:creator>Enviro Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.absolutemichigan.com/dig/?p=1697#comment-39171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is the Democratic Party that is responsible for savaging the Worldâ€™s climate with high CO2 emissions, not Republicans.  Yes, you heard that correctly.
First of all, through its longstanding and continuing opposition to nuclear power, the Democratic Party has forced and will continue to force this country to rely on coal and oil for much of its energy needs for the foreseeable future.  Nuclear power is safe and emits next to nothing in terms of greenhouse emissions, but your Democratic Party will have none of it.   And anyone who thinks Barack Obama and the current cast in your Democratic Congress will build nuclear power plants is dreaming.   
Secondly, the Democratic Party is also responsible for high CO2 emissions because its anti business policies have driven more businesses overseas to China and India(where the businesses can pollute the environment as they wish).   Your Democratic Party seems to have forgotten that, as far as the greenhouse effect is concerned, the worldâ€™s environment is not helped simply by moving polluters from one spot to the next.
Thirdly, as if it were bad enough the Democratic Partyâ€™s anti business practices have driven more polluters to pollution heaven in China and India, the Democratic Party has shown absolutely no serious interest whatsoever in clamping down on CO2 emissions from China and India.   Al Gore(a patron saint of environmentalism) and others have pushed for China and India to be exempt from Kyotoâ€™s emissions standards saying its â€œunfairâ€ for developing countries to be forced to reduce their CO2 emissions.   Hey Al, in case you havenâ€™t noticed China is now an economic powerhouse.   Moreover Al, your position makes no sense.   We have 10 years according to you to prevent an irreversible greenhouse effect and youâ€™re ok with 3/8 of the Worldâ€™s population doing nothing in terms of limiting CO2 emissions?   
A co founder of Greenpeace parted ways with Greenpeace over its opposition to nuclear power.   We should likewise part ways with the Democratic Party over its anti nuclear, anti business policies, and pro China and India exemption from CO2 emissions policies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the Democratic Party that is responsible for savaging the Worldâ€™s climate with high CO2 emissions, not Republicans.  Yes, you heard that correctly.<br />
First of all, through its longstanding and continuing opposition to nuclear power, the Democratic Party has forced and will continue to force this country to rely on coal and oil for much of its energy needs for the foreseeable future.  Nuclear power is safe and emits next to nothing in terms of greenhouse emissions, but your Democratic Party will have none of it.   And anyone who thinks Barack Obama and the current cast in your Democratic Congress will build nuclear power plants is dreaming.<br />
Secondly, the Democratic Party is also responsible for high CO2 emissions because its anti business policies have driven more businesses overseas to China and India(where the businesses can pollute the environment as they wish).   Your Democratic Party seems to have forgotten that, as far as the greenhouse effect is concerned, the worldâ€™s environment is not helped simply by moving polluters from one spot to the next.<br />
Thirdly, as if it were bad enough the Democratic Partyâ€™s anti business practices have driven more polluters to pollution heaven in China and India, the Democratic Party has shown absolutely no serious interest whatsoever in clamping down on CO2 emissions from China and India.   Al Gore(a patron saint of environmentalism) and others have pushed for China and India to be exempt from Kyotoâ€™s emissions standards saying its â€œunfairâ€ for developing countries to be forced to reduce their CO2 emissions.   Hey Al, in case you havenâ€™t noticed China is now an economic powerhouse.   Moreover Al, your position makes no sense.   We have 10 years according to you to prevent an irreversible greenhouse effect and youâ€™re ok with 3/8 of the Worldâ€™s population doing nothing in terms of limiting CO2 emissions?<br />
A co founder of Greenpeace parted ways with Greenpeace over its opposition to nuclear power.   We should likewise part ways with the Democratic Party over its anti nuclear, anti business policies, and pro China and India exemption from CO2 emissions policies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
